Unveiling the Truth Behind COVID-19 Excess Deaths in the UK

Welcome to today's critical discussion on an issue that has been largely overlooked: the alarming number of deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic attributed to medical interventions, specifically the use of medications such as midazolam and morphine. This discussion draws from the significant research conducted by Wilson Sai, which highlights troubling correlations between medication administration and excess mortality rates.

The Serious Implications of Medical Interventions

In the midst of the pandemic, healthcare professionals were tasked with managing an unprecedented crisis. However, a disturbing trend has emerged regarding the use of midazolam and morphine in treating patients. According to Sai's research, there is a striking correlation between the distribution of midazolam and the subsequent spike in excess deaths, suggesting that these medications may have played a significant role in mortality rates.

Understanding the Data

To comprehend the gravity of the situation, it's essential to analyze the data presented in Sai's paper. The research indicates:

A correlation coefficient of 91% between midazolam injections and excess deaths across the UK.
Excess deaths remained elevated even after mass vaccination efforts began in 2021.
The spike in deaths attributed to COVID-19 in April 2020 was likely not due to the virus itself but rather the widespread use of midazolam.

The Role of Coroners and Data Integrity

One of the most troubling aspects of this situation is the apparent failure of the coroner system in the UK to adequately investigate these deaths. Established over 800 years ago, the coroner's role is to determine the cause of death, yet there seems to be a lack of scrutiny over the factors contributing to excess mortality during the pandemic.

Systemic Failures and Their Consequences

The systemic failures in data collection and medical governance have led to significant ambiguities regarding the true causes of death during the pandemic. Sai argues that errors in data interpretation and reporting have obscured the reality of the situation, potentially misleading public health responses and policies.

Historical Context and Lessons Learned

Drawing parallels to historical data, Sai references the work of Alfred Russell Wallace, who faced similar challenges in data integrity over a century ago regarding vaccination effects. Wallace's conclusions emphasized the importance of environmental conditions over vaccination alone in reducing mortality rates.

Conclusion: A Call for Action

As we navigate the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to critically examine the data surrounding excess deaths. The implications of these findings are profound, especially for the families of those who lost loved ones during this tumultuous time. There is an urgent need for transparency in data reporting and a thorough investigation into the causes of these excess deaths to provide closure for grieving families.

To fully understand the complexities surrounding these issues, I encourage readers to access Wilson Sai's paper for a comprehensive analysis of the data and its implications.